Surprising words not accepted

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bloodroot
    replied
    OK, now it wouldn't accept "rewild" which is in its dictionary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nylimb
    replied
    COMPUTABLY is rejected, but INCOMPUTABLY is accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • InsertNameHere
    replied
    Originally posted by DrPlacebo
    Just had the plural PHOTOHELIOGRAPHS accepted but the singular PHOTOHELIOGRAPH rejected.
    that's because the dictionary this site uses doesn't support 15+ letter words, so it switched to a different one for 16-25 letter words. the two dictionaries are slightly different so sometimes only the plural or only the singular is accepted

    Leave a comment:


  • onrust
    replied
    I just had the word "farters" rejected... who can convince me that that's not a word?

    Leave a comment:


  • DrPlacebo
    replied
    Just had the plural PHOTOHELIOGRAPHS accepted but the singular PHOTOHELIOGRAPH rejected.

    Leave a comment:


  • onrust
    replied
    I just had "shoddiness" rejected... hmmm... am I wrong about that one?

    Leave a comment:


  • kaitoujuliet
    replied
    I just did a puzzle where CAFFEINATED, DECAFFEINATED, and DECAFFEINATE were accepted, but CAFFEINATE was not.

    Leave a comment:


  • onrust
    replied
    I found "decommissioned" in a 4x4 puzzle, but it was not accepted... neither was "decommission".. I thought that was odd...

    Leave a comment:


  • crazykate
    replied
    "shan't" is a contraction of "shall not", just as "won't" is a contraction of "will not". They both need an apostrophe. "Wont" is also a word with a different meaning than "won't", also pronounced slightly differently. Unless there is a word "shant" with a different meaning to "shan't" that I'm not aware of, "shan't" does require an apostrophe.

    Leave a comment:


  • renananova
    replied
    Shant. I use the word. I've read the word in many books. I don't remember it needing an apostrophe.

    Leave a comment:


  • onrust
    replied
    I would have thought that "accoster" was good... am I wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • kaitoujuliet
    replied
    ONI, as in a Japanese mythological monster. It surprises me that they don't have it, since they have lots of other Japanese words, such as GETA and NABE.

    Leave a comment:


  • DrPlacebo
    replied
    CAFFEINATED counts, as do both DECAFFEINATE and DECAFFEINATED, but oddly CAFFEINATE doesn't count.

    Leave a comment:


  • John13verse34
    replied
    Interesting that WESTERNIZE/S and WESTERNISE/S are accepted, but EASTERNIZE and variations are not. I guess cultural adaptation only goes one way... ;-D

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike1007
    replied
    I'm sometimes surprised at the number of RE- words that also allow IRRE-. Yes, If I see UN- (or IN-) in front of a word, I'll try it. It doesn't always work, but enough to keep trying.

    Leave a comment:

Working...