I'm confused about scoring. I just played a board and I found cryoplankton which was considered ultra-rare and worth 23 points. But then I typed cryoplanktons which was only considered a wide word and worth 16 pts. How is the same word, but pluralized, worth less and considered less rare?
Scoring
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
That's one of the mysteries of the universe. I assume that rarity values come from some database (maybe the result of word counts in a variety of texts). Most of the time, the values kind of make sense, but often enough things like this happen. About all you can do is wonder. -
. . . and that one is particularly interesting. In decades of reading in zoology, marine sciences, cryptozoology, etc., I have seen cryptoplankton, but never the plural.Comment
-
That's one of the mysteries of the universe. I assume that rarity values come from some database (maybe the result of word counts in a variety of texts). Most of the time, the values kind of make sense, but often enough things like this happen. About all you can do is wonder.Last edited by lalatan; 01-19-2023, 02:56 PM.Comment
-
I think when using it in the plural sense it refers to different types of cryoplankton? I feel like I read that somewhere a while back (same idea as fish vs. fishes). I haven't read a lot on zoology though, so I could be totally out of left field there.Comment
-
Seems to be used as a collective noun, as is plankton. We talk about 1 species of goose or 10 species of geese, 1 breed of dog or horse or many breeds of dogs or horses, but generally use plankton (& varieties of types of plankton) to mean one or many species, depending on the context.Comment
Comment