Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The strange, the bizarre and the unexpected

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lalatan found this one... definitely worth shining a light on! :-D. OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICAL

    Comment


    • Ah, yes. Back in the days when I sold my software, one of my customers was from a university. The professor worked in the department of otorhinolaryngology, and that's how the name was entered into our database. Basically it's the ear-nose-throat doctor specialty name.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bwt1213 View Post
        Ah, yes. Back in the days when I sold my software, one of my customers was from a university. The professor worked in the department of otorhinolaryngology, and that's how the name was entered into our database. Basically it's the ear-nose-throat doctor specialty name.
        I've gone to that kind of doctor. For a long time I wore heavy earrings & @ the time I didn't equate wearing them to having more ear infections. Well after a while I found it difficult to wear the earrings because of the ear infections & I stopped. Then I wore lighter earrings. Ever since I only wear lighter earrings, I've stopped having ear infections.

        This type of doctor is a specialist, so he/she also charges specialist prices verses going to your primary care physician.

        Comment


        • I got REAPPROXIMATIONS, APPROXIMATIONS, PROXIMATIONS, OXIMATIONS, the latter as a hail mary. I wonder what is the longest chain of words from a single root is that someone has found.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by BoggleOtaku View Post
            I got REAPPROXIMATIONS, APPROXIMATIONS, PROXIMATIONS, OXIMATIONS, the latter as a hail mary. I wonder what is the longest chain of words from a single root is that someone has found.
            The exact parameters for "root" might get a little tricky in determining the answer.

            I've wondered the same thing. Ran across several chemical terms lately that had a boatload of derivitives. But just wasn't sure what would constitute an allowable word for your inquiry.

            Just played a game which had alphabet. Is the root alpha or beta? Or both, for the above question?

            Anyhow. I only played analphabet, analphabets and analphabetics.

            Wouldn't even have played the analphabet but it had come up lately with elementary school learning and I loved the word.

            Playing too many long words is counterproductive to my game style. Too many opportunities for typos and fumbling.

            Which meant that even though I saw the likelihood of analphabetic, alphabet, alphabets, alphabetic, alphabetics, alpha; I ignored them. Also saw alphabeting after the game ended.

            Probably nowhere near what you're looking for numerically, but ten words isn't bad.

            Screen Shot 2023-06-28 at 3.10.48 PM.png

            Comment


            • Thanks for the reply. That's quite a list! I was thinking of root not in a grammar sense, but as a beginning word to which more letters are successively added (to the beginning or to the end or to both) to make new words. In your list, for instance, ANA, ANAL, ANALPHABET, ANALPHABETIC, ANALPHABETICS would be one such chain. I probably forgot to add IONS to my list (I probably scored it), so a chain of 5 looks readily achievable under this interpretation, I guess. As you say, there are different ways to define what is allowable.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BoggleOtaku View Post
                Thanks for the reply. That's quite a list! I was thinking of root not in a grammar sense, but as a beginning word to which more letters are successively added (to the beginning or to the end or to both) to make new words. In your list, for instance, ANA, ANAL, ANALPHABET, ANALPHABETIC, ANALPHABETICS would be one such chain. I probably forgot to add IONS to my list (I probably scored it), so a chain of 5 looks readily achievable under this interpretation, I guess. As you say, there are different ways to define what is allowable.
                BoggleOtaku,

                just played this. crazy number of words with capital in the mix. a 16 letter word worth 33.

                See how many you can find. Probably around 20 or more. Don't really feel like fleshing it out.

                But for anyone who does...

                For those providing word examples, please give others a chance and don't provide more than 3.

                Screen Shot 2023-06-30 at 4.02.50 PM.png

                Comment


                • Upped the PR on ultrarare words to 108 twice this morning.

                  So close to The Red Board. The first had two mistyped words, and two thought-they-were-ultrarares but weren't.

                  Screen Shot 2023-07-03 at 9.47.20 AM.png

                  This second one had three mistyped: like rit instead of rait, and spa when the fingers got confused trying for spale.

                  Screen Shot 2023-07-03 at 10.02.20 AM.png

                  Think I need to slow it down even more to avoid the mistyping.

                  Sigh.

                  But then I risk not hitting a hundred words. Need that hundred words to qualify for The Red Board.

                  Comment


                  • Naboka,

                    Just got: HARM,PHARM,PHARMA,PHARMACOLOGIC,PHARMACOLOGICAL,PH ARMACOLOGICALLY,NEUROPHARMACOLOGICALLY, for chain of 7. I wonder if 10 is possible.

                    There are an amazing number in that 4x4. I have noticed, with the new ultra large word count boards added in 5x5, many ultra large word count boards having words with the various alterations found in your board for many different roots even in the same board, such as MORAL-,NORMAL-,IDEAL-,RATIONAL-, etc. I was going to try to find an example to post, but haven't run across one the last couple of days to my surprise.

                    Congtrats on your last post. I think you can overcome the asymptote to perfection with your persistence. I was wondering why 100 words; is it your personal goal targeting a difficult yet attainable challenge?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BoggleOtaku View Post
                      Naboka,

                      Just got: HARM,PHARM,PHARMA,PHARMACOLOGIC,PHARMACOLOGICAL,PH ARMACOLOGICALLY,NEUROPHARMACOLOGICALLY, for chain of 7. I wonder if 10 is possible.

                      There are an amazing number in that 4x4. I have noticed, with the new ultra large word count boards added in 5x5, many ultra large word count boards having words with the various alterations found in your board for many different roots even in the same board, such as MORAL-,NORMAL-,IDEAL-,RATIONAL-, etc. I was going to try to find an example to post, but haven't run across one the last couple of days to my surprise.

                      Congtrats on your last post. I think you can overcome the asymptote to perfection with your persistence. I was wondering why 100 words; is it your personal goal targeting a difficult yet attainable challenge?
                      Thanks.

                      And congrats.

                      Yep. Attainability.

                      And safety.

                      With sufficient difficulty to make it worth the effort.

                      I'd practised typing a while back and was hitting 150 words occaisionally on 4x4. Lasted less than a week, then the inflammation got so bad I had to cut back.

                      Way back.

                      I was worried I'd have to stop playing entirely.

                      Who wants to live with tunnel carpal and that ilk?

                      Now I just try to set an easy pace in the 100 word range. If I go much over that, the pain makes me pay. (Though lots of games I play end up with less than 80 words so the fingers get a little rest.)

                      100 is just such a delightful milestone number, so...

                      Just think how few of us reach a hundred years.

                      Not to mention, anyone could do a perfect red board if the standard were: a red board. Type one word that's ultrarare and you've done it. Or ten. Or fifty.

                      I'll probably hit 110 UR's eventually. Find some board with 300-400 ultrarares and hit a groove. Saw some longer ultrarare words on both the above boards that I didn't play to optimize the word count--and reduce the chance for errors. Lot of good that did, but... I've been leaving a lot of words untyped.

                      But, all this ignores the dozens of games that crash and burn before leaving the runway. It's a lot of failures hiding behind the successes.

                      Have fun on your word hunts. (Or haunts.) Always a bit more exciting to have personal sidebars to what you're doing.

                      Comment


                      • Since I was just curious about how long the chain could be, I decided ask IGT chat. After trying to correct its response about 15 times (for instance, "championshipshipshipship" is not a valid word), here is what I got:

                        Apologies for the oversight. Let me provide a valid example that satisfies all the criteria:

                        chain (5 letters) → chains (6 letters) → chainsaw (8 letters) → chainsaws (9 letters) → chainsawed (11 letters) → disenchanted (12 letters) → disqualified (12 letters) → disqualifiers (13 letters) → undeniably (10 letters) → (no valid word)

                        In this revised chain, the word lengths grow each time, and each word includes the previous word exactly without any permutations. The chain stops when no valid word can be formed by adding letters to the beginning or end while meeting all the given rules. I apologize for the previous errors, and thank you for your patience.


                        After this response, I realized it "thought" I specified "chain" as the word to start with. After correcting this and another 10 or so corrections, I got:

                        Apologies for the error in the previous response. Let's start with the word "disappear" to create a valid chain:

                        disappear → appearance → appearances → reappearance → reappearances → irreappearances → irreappearances' →

                        In this revised chain, each word is formed by adding letters either to the beginning or the end of the previous word, adhering to the given rules. This chain consists of 7 words. Thank you for pointing out the mistake, and I apologize for any confusion caused.

                        Last edited by BoggleOtaku; 07-03-2023, 05:46 PM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by BoggleOtaku View Post
                          Since I was just curious about how long the chain could be, I decided ask IGT chat. After trying to correct its response about 15 times (for instance, "championshipshipshipship" is not a valid word), here is what I got:

                          Apologies for the oversight. Let me provide a valid example that satisfies all the criteria:

                          chain (5 letters) → chains (6 letters) → chainsaw (8 letters) → chainsaws (9 letters) → chainsawed (11 letters) → disenchanted (12 letters) → disqualified (12 letters) → disqualifiers (13 letters) → undeniably (10 letters) → (no valid word)

                          In this revised chain, the word lengths grow each time, and each word includes the previous word exactly without any permutations. The chain stops when no valid word can be formed by adding letters to the beginning or end while meeting all the given rules. I apologize for the previous errors, and thank you for your patience.


                          After this response, I realized it "thought" I specified "chain" as the word to start with. After correcting this and another 10 or so corrections, I got:

                          Apologies for the error in the previous response. Let's start with the word "disappear" to create a valid chain:

                          disappear → appearance → appearances → reappearance → reappearances → irreappearances → irreappearances' →

                          In this revised chain, each word is formed by adding letters either to the beginning or the end of the previous word, adhering to the given rules. This chain consists of 7 words. Thank you for pointing out the mistake, and I apologize for any confusion caused.

                          no idea what IGT chat is. One of the downsides of being old and technologically deficient.

                          Comment


                          • Typo: I meant ChatGPT
                            New Chat (freechatgpt.chat)

                            ​I tried suggesting the reverse operation, and I think it helped constrain the problem, better, but still basic problems like not being able to count the numbers of letters in the starting word correctly plus making up words at the end of the chain in order to inflate the result to some expected number. Here's the best I was able to achieve, with further corrects leading to poorer responses:

                            Apologies for the oversight once again. Here's a new example of a chain starting with a word of at least 22 letters, aiming for a chain with at least 8 words:

                            Disproportionateness → Disproportionate → Proportionate → Proportion → Portion → Port → Pot → Po

                            In this chain, each word is formed by truncating letters from the previous word to form a valid word. This chain consists of 8 words.

                            I apologize for the confusion caused by the previous errors, and I appreciate your patience. If you have any further instructions or requests, please let me know.

                            Comment


                            • You can detox, and apparently you can also RETOX. I did not expect that to be accepted.

                              Comment


                              • Lalatan has brought up the phenomenon of running across a strange word, then soon after running across it in a game.

                                We have a couple hundred hosta in the back shade gardens. From tiny mouse varieties to huge ones over 3' high and 4-5' wide.

                                And plenty of snails. The mortal enemy of beautiful hosta. That do this. Just a stock photo but it's what some of our hosta look like at the moment.

                                th-2739984031.jpg

                                So, researching how to best handle the problem, we ran across the weird phenomenon where snails can actually act as pollinators for a certain plants.

                                Malicophily is pollination by snails and malicophilous is the adaption by a plant to being pollinated by snails.

                                Boring.

                                Right.

                                Not that it's any more interesting than hundreds of other words here.

                                But...

                                reading about that stuff in the last week while learning how to better get rid of snails--and then running across

                                Screen Shot 2023-07-07 at 11.40.54 PM.png

                                Weird how the universe works.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X