Achievements and Accomplishments Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bwt1213
    replied
    Originally posted by JedMedGrey
    bwt1213 - Thank you! Have you tried Chalet Cheese Co-op's Pannaro yet? It is a Gouda/Parmesan blend - Parmesan flavor and Gouda creamy meltiness. Quite good!
    I will have to look for it. I hope it's made in Wisconsin, though; cheeses that are not have trouble passing the Cheddar Curtain.

    Leave a comment:


  • JedMedGrey
    replied
    bwt1213 - Thank you! Have you tried Chalet Cheese Co-op's Pannaro yet? It is a Gouda/Parmesan blend - Parmesan flavor and Gouda creamy meltiness. Quite good!

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike1007
    replied
    Naboka, what I said seems right for 5x5. (There, for a word with n letters, the value is r*(n-1)+s, where r is a rarity multiplier (which 1 for common words, 1.3 for wide, 1.6 for rare, and 2 for ultra-rare (rounding down to the nearest integer when necessary)), and s comes from the special letters as in my previous post.) For your 4x4 board, scoring seems different. I assume that HOT and OAT are "common", but they're both 3 points. OAK and OAKS are both worth 4, which is weird unless there's a difference in rarity values (which I doubt) or something else is going on. My guess is that, for 3-letter words (which aren't accepted in 5x5), scoring is r*n+s (with n = 3), while for 4 or more letter words, it's r*(n-1)+s, the same as 5x5, with s the same in both. (I assume OAT and OAK are both common, and the K in OAK just adds one point.) Maybe I'll play with some 4x4 boards & test my thoughts...

    Leave a comment:


  • Naboka
    replied
    Originally posted by Spike1007
    I used to think there should be a rarity difference between American & British spellings, but the score difference just comes down to word length (like using -OU- rather than -O-) & "special" letters. Q is worth 4, Z is 3, X is 2, and J & K are 1. (Each letter can only contribute once per word. For instance, two Qs still only add 4 points.)
    Always thought k's and j's generated more points. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean.

    Here's the k portion of a game I just finished. Seems like a lode of points. And who knows what didn't get typed.

    Screen Shot 2022-08-30 at 11.27.45 AM.png

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike1007
    replied
    I used to think there should be a rarity difference between American & British spellings, but the score difference just comes down to word length (like using -OU- rather than -O-) & "special" letters. Q is worth 4, Z is 3, X is 2, and J & K are 1. (Each letter can only contribute once per word. For instance, two Qs still only add 4 points.)

    Leave a comment:


  • bwt1213
    replied
    Congratulations! Personal best records are the only ones that count; there is always a King Kong to make you feel small, otherwise. And for the point difference? The "Z" counts for more points than the "S". I didn't think it was three points, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • JedMedGrey
    replied
    Just got my best single word score on a 4 x 4 - POSTERIZES - for 21 pts. Interesting that POSTERISE is 16 pts, but with a "Z" it is 19 pts.

    Leave a comment:


  • JedMedGrey
    replied
    I believe I recall a post about SEPTENTRIGINTILLIONTH (21 letters, 40 pts by lalatan). Well, I got that board, and although I did not find said word, I did find "GILLIONS", a first for the board.

    Belated Happy Birthday, folkslinger!

    Leave a comment:


  • lalatan
    replied
    Happy birthday folkslinger! Wow, a flight in WW!! bomber would be amazing.
    Last edited by lalatan; 08-14-2022, 02:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike1007
    replied
    Originally posted by folkslinger
    ...we were the same age (until today, now I'm 72.)
    Happy birthday, folkslinger!

    Leave a comment:


  • folkslinger
    replied
    mcdonna ......."And make sure to include time here. You have friends here." Quoted from BWT1213.

    I will certainly 2nd that sentiment.

    You have been great to watch since you have come back to the game.
    Your earlier comments on the new long words (quinquaquinqua...etc etc.) How fast you found information on them and understood what they were FLOORED me because it had taken me sooo much longer to get my head around them and we were the same age (until today, now I'm 72.) Which reminds me I better play the game and get to bed because I have to get up early and go for a flight in a World War II B25 Mitchell Bomber for my birthday. Tick another one off the bucket list!

    Leave a comment:


  • bwt1213
    replied
    Freevee is also free, and so is Tubi and Plex and Xumo, and . . . Anyway, here's another one for you: Columbo. I'll bet you haven't seen them all. I certainly haven't. Ah, but Peacock is free, too. And they have all the original Columbo stuff. The ads are really light, though, only 15 - 30 seconds for most of them. There's a Columbo movie that predates the series: "Prescription: Murder". The movie starts with an announcement that they don't want to mess the movie up, so there will be only one commercial break at the beginning, and the movie will then be shown uninterrupted. And it was good, too.

    FreeVee (formerly IMDb) has almost every movie you ever wanted to see. And every series. I'll bet you'll like Mary Berry and her cooking shows (British, of course). But Pluto has America's Test Kitchen, and Antiques Roadshow (British version) and Antiques Road Trip (addictive and fun). Haystack News and Local News Now give you local news broadcasts free.

    There's another feed for Science Fiction classics. Wanna watch "Flowers for Algernon"? It's there.

    You have to be judicious. There's so much there. It really is a firehose. If you have ADHD, then you need to make a list. Here are the movies I'd like to watch. Here are the series. Here are the kinds of shows. Now, where are they? Today, you watch one Columbo and one Antiques Road Trip. Tomorrow, you watch one America's Test Kitchen and one Julia Child. And so on. If you like Star Trek, then Paramount+ is where you go. You can watch all the original Star Trek and all the spin-offs. Want to watch Twilight Zone? That's Peacock, also free.

    I wasn't kidding about shows about life in old Rome and Greek Myths and the rest of it, either. So it really is a firehose. The only possible solution to that is to ration your time. Two hours of TV per day (or whatever) and no more. So many hours of reading, and no more. So many hours walking, or jogging, or exercising. If you let yourself run free, you're running down the rabbit hole too much of the time. You know that already.

    And make sure to include time here. You have friends here.

    Leave a comment:


  • mcdonna
    replied
    Originally posted by bwt1213
    Since you don't have TV, I suggest you investigate Pluto. It's FAST (Free Ad-Supported Television) and you can view it on your computer. ...

    The internet can be like a firehose, but you can filter it down to something a little more manageable. ...
    Thanks for the suggestion of Pluto; I'll definitely look into it.

    As for firehoses, long before the Internet there was infinitely more content than I'm able to manage, starting with our small local library when I was in first grade. I've only had TV/streaming service a few times in my life and then only because someone else in the household had chosen to install it. I've picked up little packages here and there to watch Star Trek or local news but if I have more options I can disappear into them and never come out. I discovered last year (at age 71) that I have ADHD, which helps to explain why it's so difficult for me to focus on anything important if there is something more immediately appealing in the neighborhood.

    YouTube is almost manageable. The first year of the pandemic I became seriously addicted, first to news, then to opera (go figure), then to Baryshnikov ballet. The only way I can keep it under control these days is that I unsubscribed and hid the most tempting channels and do NOT pay to turn off ads, as they are annoying enough to remind me that I might need to be doing something else!

    The only real downside is that I'm left out of conversations whenever the topic turns to popular culture. I don't really miss watching the shows but I do miss being able to chat with friends. Luckily there are Star Trek fans lurking in many corners.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spike1007
    replied
    In an earlier post of mine, I said that losing contact with the Wordtwist server during play might not be fatal if you could reestablish the connection even after the time had run out. Stephen may have been paying attention & changed that. I played a board where I entered a word, then lost contact before time ran out. (I have occasional Xfinity problems, especially in the morning.) Anyway, I managed to switch networks & get reconnected, probably less than 30 seconds after the board would have timed out. This time, it did give final stats for the board showing no words played and a message I'd never seen before: "This game started too long ago to be tallied." Looks like Stephen may have added a timer.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2cute
    replied
    Okay, after I wrote the list, I realized I hadn't kept up w/what they owned & for how long, the info could've changed. Yep, it changed. So my info is a little wrong. As far as Disney, it does own Fox Sports (so Murdoch only owns the news division now). I found this informative very detailed map of all the companies Disney owns but if I add the actual link, this message will be flagged for spam, so here's a portion of it: titlemax.com/wp-content/uploads/every-company-disney-owns.jpeg (this map is as of 2019, so it could've changed since then). Here's another site that lists their holdings: filmdaft.com/what-companies-does-disney-own/ .

    As far as Comcast still owning Disney, I'm finding conflicting info, I know it did @ one time but ... well, that'll be another hour of research for another time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...